Sunday, May 13, 2012

Don't worry. Everything's gonna be alright.

Many a peace seeker has stumbled on the notion that in order for Good to exist, there MUST be Evil in order to achieve balance and define Good's existence.   This concept of the primacy of "equal and opposite" is not only false, but is a primary block, hindering our evolution as beings.


I am not going to bother deconstructing all the current philosophical principals which contradict (not disprove) my coming assertions.  This is for a few reasons:  1. It may not be possible in the current paradigm.  2. It is not necessary.  3.  Destruction is against my engineering nature and simply not of interest.  That said...


One of my truisms reads:  "The existence of an object (physical or otherwise) is defined by its absence."  The extraordinary evolutionary implications of this statement have just come to my awareness today; in the last two hours in fact; during the shower I just took.  The towel I used is still around my waist, functioning as my fashionable outfit.


Why is this seemingly unremarkable, but perceptive truism, actually quite remarkable?  Because of what it doesn't say.  Note is says, "absence".  It does not say, "anti-existence".  In numerical terms it is referring to "0", not the Negative of a number as the active agent in establishing the number's quantity.  In terms of physical reality it can be understood as such:  As perceiving beings, we are able to define objects.  When an object is moved, the "nothingness" which occurs (or would occur) in its wake establishes its limits and therefore its existence within our perceived reality.  The defining element is the "nothingness" it leaves behind, NOT a gaping hole of anti-matter left behind.


With this new fundamental precept guiding our extrapolation, development, and creation of our reality as a single vector (from 0 and upward) a different world becomes possible.  Something from nothing becomes possible, i.e. free energy.  Evil no longer must exist to enable Good.  We can simply have Good and the absence of Good, NOT the presence of Evil. i.e. Neutral.  For example, you can either help the old lady across the street or don't help.  You don't have to smack her upside the head as you pass by.  We can have Peace without War, Joy without Depression, Engagement without Boredom, Love without Hate.  Our self-destruction becomes no longer inevitable.  Actually, this is the true nature of reality this very moment, we just need to realize it as a world.


So I say, "Somehow, someday, someway, everything is gonna be alright."  I just hope it's sooner rather than later.

Tuesday, May 08, 2012

Another Thought On Earth, The Alien Farm Planet, etc.

It appears to me that there's some type of significant inverse correlation between Time and Size (both undefined as of yet).  I'm not talking sturdy laws of nature here, I'm entering the realm of plenty of exceptions to the rule, but I simply don't care.

I'm not sure if I mean 'perception' of time or 'term of existence' within time.  Consider:   Small bugs, land based and airborne, move rather quickly relative to their size.  I haven't worked out the math, but they move a hell of a lot faster than our retarded asses.  As creatures increase in size, their speed slows down to something much more manageable (e.g. we can see birds fly across the sky, but a fly can lose us pretty easily, and without going very far away -- and then they TEASE us about our slow-ass reactions by buzzing right in our ear, but never letting us actually see or squash them.

Size continues to increase  - my little Lhasa is quicker than me if he really gets goin, but his high speed tops out low, relative to larger dogs (who he can run circles around within a 20x20 area). Conversely, you switch to a straight sprint, after about 20 yards my Lhasa is so far behind any larger dog that he'll  just lose interest and give up.

Another approach...  Insects live a matter of days, perhaps weeks at best.  Dogs live into their teen years (don't even think of arguing about turtles).  We live just shy of 100 years.  Elephants live...  50 to 70 years.  Never mind.  Let's just throw all animals and the like in together and say their life unit is years.  Plants (thinking esp. trees) can live for decades and centuries.  Then what?  Continental ecosystems as organisms? O.k. So continents live for 100's of millions of years.  Planets for billions of years. Solar systems and suns live for...  well, our sun will live nearly 10 billion years.  Did you know that in terms of volume that the sun could hold 1.3 MILLION Earths?  109 Earths in diameter.  Hmm, I don't know how those two "facts" resolve mathematically.  Even if the Sun were square (larger than a sphere), with 109 Earths on a side, you get...  hey, what do ya know!  1.3 million!  I guess figuring the volume as a square compensates for the space unaccounted for due to the Earth being a sphere...

Anyway, I think this theory pretty much sucks at this point...  we'll see if anything more ever develops...
Cheers.